Today’s AI Top Pick: STEP

7/30/2026 · Swing Setup screen · a free sample of K3vl4r’s AI-curated picks.

AI-ranked from a screened shortlist, with entry strategy, targets, and risks.

Measured weekly model accuracy · STEP67%21 resolved forecasts · 90d window · verify →

View the live STEP price forecast →

Today's pick · Swing SetupSTEPBUY NOW8.6 / 107/30/2026

StepStone Group (STEP) offers the cleanest multi-timeframe alignment in the pool right now. Near-term bullish reads 1.0 with bullish_prob 1, and every intraday/daily forecast horizon points up: 1h forecasts +19.4%/+10.0%/+16.3%, 4h +16.2%/+29.3%/+35.3%, and 1d +6.0%/+23.6%/+23.7%. The only mild negative is the weekly short-term (-5.2%), and even that flips positive by the long horizon (+2.4%). That is textbook multi-timeframe agreement — you rarely get all three shorter TFs echoing each other on both direction and magnitude. Crucially, STEP is NOT extended. Position in 21-bar range is 24% on 1h and 26% on 1wk, with 4h/1d in the mid-60s to 70s — nowhere near the chase zone. Drawdown from recent highs is only -3% on the intraday charts but a healthy -20.6% on the weekly, meaning this is a base-building bounce, not a blow-off top. Analyst recom is a strong 1.38, target upside 54.7%, EPS next year growth 35.4%, sales growth 69.9%. Morgan Stanley just held Equal-Weight with a $63 PT (~45% above current $43.44), confirming institutional support even after a modest PT trim. The fundamentals block flags a scary ROE (-750) and negative operating margin because of stock-comp/GP-carry accounting typical of alt-asset managers post-IPO restructure — this is not an operational red flag the way it would be for an industrial. PEG 0.66, fwd P/E 12.9 and 69% sales growth are what actually matter here, and they're pristine. Why today, not later: the setup is a bounce off the low end of the intraday range with unanimous forecast confirmation. Waiting for a deeper pullback risks missing the 6-23% daily forecast move; the current level (43.44) is only $1 above the 1h range low. Fundamentally-cleaner names like HMY have stretched 68-81% range positioning and a deeply negative weekly forecast (-33% mid, -51% long) that undercuts the trade. CELH has better fundamentals but weaker near-term (0.8) and a negative 4h short-term forecast. FUTU is disqualified by a live DOJ probe headline. STEP is the trade with the cleanest signal-to-noise ratio today.

STEP forecast chart
Entry zone
$42.75–$43.75 (current $43.44, buy on any intraday dip toward the 1h range low near $42.50)
Stop loss
$40.90 (below the 4h range low and ~5.8% risk; a break there invalidates the base)
First target
$47.50 (~+9%, aligns with 1h fc_short +19% pulled back for slippage and prior 4h range highs)
Longer target
$53.50–$55.00 (+23% to +27%, matches 4h/1d mid-horizon forecasts of +29% to +35% and Morgan Stanley $63 PT trajectory)
Risks
  • Negative reported ROE (-750) and operating margin (-45.6%) mean any GAAP-focused sell-side reset could spook holders even though the metrics are structural, not operational
  • Weekly forecast short-horizon is -5.2% — if broader market rolls over, the daily bounce can be smothered by the weekly downtrend
  • Short float 9.19% is manageable but non-trivial; a break of $40.90 could trigger a momentum flush
  • Morgan Stanley just LOWERED its price target to $63 (from higher); sell-side momentum is decelerating even if still bullish
  • Alt-asset managers are levered to private-market fundraising conditions — a rate/credit shock would compress the whole subsector regardless of setup
Honorable mentions
CELHExplosive mid/long forecasts (1d +55.5%/+48.2%, 4h +42.5%/+43.3%), range position only 29-35% (not chasing), PEG 0.78 with 123% sales growth. Held back to #2 by negative 4h short-term forecast (-7.4%) and near_term_bullish only 0.8 vs STEP's 1.0.
KRMNMassive forecast magnitudes (1h fc +45%/+25.6%/+54%, 4h +38.8%/+60.3%/+67.1%) with rock-bottom range positioning (8-27%) and a positive RBC catalyst on H2 organic growth acceleration + Walker deal. Held back by null bullish_prob (missing signal), stretched valuation (fwdPe 49.5, ps 11.56), and no weekly TF data.
Full ranking (30)
#SymbolVerdictScoreRead
1STEPBUY NOW8.6Cleanest multi-TF alignment: near_term 1.0, all 1h/4h/1d forecasts positive, range position 24-68%, recom 1.38.
2CELHBUY NOW8.1Deep base with explosive 1d mid/long forecasts (+55%/+48%), not chasing (range 29-35%), 123% sales growth.
3KRMNBUY NOW7.9Enormous forecast magnitudes and 8-27% range positioning; H2 catalyst confirmed by RBC despite PT trim.
4HMYBUY PULLBACK7.5Best fundamentals (PE 10.7, PEG 0.09, ROE 33%) and all short-TF forecasts up, but range 68-81% and weekly fc long -51% argue for a dip.
5SRADBUY PULLBACK7.2Solid 4h/1d mid-forecasts (+23-30%) but pinned at 95% of 1h range and Stifel/Guggenheim cut PTs — wait for a fade.
6AVAVBUY PULLBACK6.9Huge 1d mid/long fc (+62%/+70%) after -30% weekly drawdown and positive AV/Teledyne/Applied Intuition catalysts, but near_term only 0.6.
7KCBUY NOW6.7Near_term 1.0 with 1h fc +47%/+57%/+55% and SeekingAlpha upgrade to Buy citing 100%+ upside on AI shift.
8FUTUWAIT6.3Forecasts are massive (+43-65%) but an active DOJ probe and class actions are a live landmine — do not lead with this.
9GILBUY PULLBACK6.0Great fundamentals (recom 1.27, PEG 0.46) and positive 1h/4h fc, but 1wk fc all negative and range at 89-100% on shorter TFs.
10EXKBUY PULLBACK5.9Near_term 0.8, 1h/4h fc +30%+ and matched Q2 estimates; weekly fc deeply negative (-54% mid) demands patience.
11BIRKWAIT5.5Solid fundamentals but near_term_bullish only 0.4 and mixed 4h/1d forecasts; needs a clearer signal.
12VRDNWAIT5.34h/1d fc constructive but 1h fc_short -17%, near_term readouts capped, valuation stretched (P/S 30.95).
13VFSWAIT5.21h fc +22-30% with 89% weekly drawdown but fundamentals are catastrophic (opMargin -82%, profit -110%).
14CHYMWAIT5.0BMO cut PT to $28 but still Outperform; forecasts moderate and fundamental score only 2.25.
15BULLWAIT4.9Broke 200DMA and near_term only 0.2; 1h/4h forecasts mixed, needs momentum confirmation.
16TARSWAIT4.84h/1d mid-fc positive but 1wk fc long -35.9%; Zacks flags negative Q2 earnings risk into the print.
17SUPNWAIT4.6Positive earnings expectations and Simply Wall St 25% undervalued call, but 1wk fc -30%/-34% is a hard veto.
18CLBTWAIT4.5Pinned at 100% of 1h range with CEO selling $1.6M — 1d/1wk forecasts negative, wait for reset.
19ARISWAIT4.3Great fundamentals and Q2 record cash flow, but weekly fc -55%/-72% and bullish_prob only 0.4 — signal broken.
20DNOWWAIT4.2Limited signal, fundamental_score 3.25 and fc mostly modest single digits.
21MNRWAIT4.0bullish_prob 0 with 4h/1d/1wk forecasts mostly negative despite Raymond James Strong Buy.
22NTSKAVOID3.9fwdPe 552, opMargin -95%, profitMargin -95%; 1d fc_long -13.7%, no near-term signal.
23HAPNAVOID3.6Beat Q2 and Citizens raised PT, but all daily/weekly forecasts negative (-11% to -16%) — the news is already in the price.
24LCAVOID3.4All three TF forecasts deeply negative (1wk -14%/-24%/-28%) after a 28% weekly run; classic distribution top.
25RELYAVOID3.3Up 68% YTD and 1d/4h/1wk forecasts all sharply negative (-25% mid); StockStory flags it as facing headwinds.
26TGBAVOID3.1PE 239 with 1wk fc -68%/-71% and 1d -21%/-22%; forecast tape is broken despite positive news.
27DLOAVOID3.0bullish_prob 0 with every mid/long forecast negative across all four TFs, plus insider selling.
28SAROAVOID2.9All 1h forecasts negative (-4.7%/-13%/-21.4%); no weekly data and bullish_prob 0.
29TPCAVOID2.71wk fc mid/long -65%/-75% is a hard AVOID even with positive Fisk contract news.
30TGTXAVOID1.8All timeframes forecast double-digit declines (-42% to -55%) after 91% weekly run; classic parabolic exhaustion.

Get AI top picks & forecasts on any stock

K3vl4r screens the market daily and ranks the best setups with AI — forecasts, scored fundamentals & technicals, and multi-horizon price targets. Create a free account to explore them all.

Create your free account →

Already a member? Sign in · Join our Discord

⚠️ This AI-generated analysis is for informational purposes only and is not financial advice. Forecasts and scores are model outputs that can be wrong; markets involve substantial risk of loss. Do your own research.